MMUFX vs. PRUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX).
MMUFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Feb 13, 1992. PRUAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 21, 1990.
Performance
MMUFX vs. PRUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMUFX vs. PRUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMUFX MFS Utilities Fund | 8.46% | 14.32% | 11.38% | -2.28% | 0.35% | 13.86% | 6.04% | 24.91% | 0.85% | 14.69% |
PRUAX PGIM Jennison Utility Fund | 6.96% | 11.47% | 39.83% | -3.96% | -0.18% | 14.89% | 4.14% | 27.06% | 1.14% | 13.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMUFX achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than PRUAX's 6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MMUFX has underperformed PRUAX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while PRUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.25% annualized return.
MMUFX
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
PRUAX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 16.99%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMUFX vs. PRUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMUFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUAX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMUFX vs. PRUAX — Risk / Return Rank
MMUFX
PRUAX
MMUFX vs. PRUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMUFX | PRUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.11 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 1.51 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 2.02 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 4.77 | +3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMUFX | PRUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.11 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.75 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.63 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.67 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMUFX and PRUAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MMUFX vs. PRUAX - Dividend Comparison
MMUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than PRUAX's 10.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMUFX MFS Utilities Fund | 3.53% | 3.83% | 3.72% | 5.82% | 8.68% | 5.61% | 5.80% | 6.85% | 4.29% | 2.67% | 3.72% | 9.09% |
PRUAX PGIM Jennison Utility Fund | 10.61% | 11.24% | 18.59% | 9.82% | 8.33% | 13.94% | 2.07% | 5.62% | 9.19% | 4.19% | 7.64% | 11.96% |
Drawdowns
MMUFX vs. PRUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMUFX drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, roughly equal to the maximum PRUAX drawdown of -58.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMUFX and PRUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMUFX | PRUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -58.20% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.06% | -9.25% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -20.65% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.82% | -35.54% | -0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -3.94% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -9.45% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.92% | -0.94% |
Volatility
MMUFX vs. PRUAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) is 5.34%, while PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that MMUFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMUFX | PRUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 5.85% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 11.31% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 16.38% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 16.97% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 17.79% | -1.25% |