VLU vs. EWMC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC).

VLU and EWMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VLU is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2012. EWMC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2010. Both VLU and EWMC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VLU vs. EWMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VLU vs. EWMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF	2.50%	16.70%	17.24%	17.18%	-8.24%	30.95%	9.91%	26.20%	-7.89%	18.16%
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF	-1.30%	7.81%	15.67%	18.79%	-11.63%	26.35%	15.60%	23.05%	-12.45%	13.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than EWMC's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VLU has outperformed EWMC with an annualized return of 13.18%, while EWMC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.

VLU

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 6.27%
• 1Y: 19.18%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: 13.18%

EWMC

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: -1.30%
• 6M: -1.63%
• 1Y: 14.14%
• 3Y*: 11.92%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 10.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLU vs. EWMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EWMC's 0.40% expense ratio.

EWMC

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF

VLU

SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF

Return for Risk

VLU vs. EWMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLU

VLU Risk / Return Rank: 70
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 76

EWMC

EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 37
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLU vs. EWMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VLU	EWMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	0.61	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.04	+0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.14	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	0.92	+0.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.78	3.90	+3.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VLU vs. EWMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the EWMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLU and EWMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VLU	EWMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	0.61	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.32	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.47	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.52	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between VLU and EWMC is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

VLU vs. EWMC - Dividend Comparison

VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than EWMC's 1.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF	1.78%	1.82%	2.00%	2.02%	2.16%	1.86%	1.98%	2.19%	2.57%	1.96%	2.14%	6.37%
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF	1.04%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%

Drawdowns

VLU vs. EWMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, smaller than the maximum EWMC drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and EWMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLU	EWMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.39%	-43.12%	+5.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.40%	-15.51%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.55%	-28.09%	+8.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.39%	-43.12%	+5.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-5.24%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-5.76%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	3.67%	-1.07%

Volatility

VLU vs. EWMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) is 4.31%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that VLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLU	EWMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	4.88%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	12.09%	-3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.77%	23.17%	-6.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	21.00%	-5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	22.27%	-4.18%