PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMTM vs. SPVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMTM vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has outperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 15.00%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


MMTM

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.46%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.58%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.00%

SPVM

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.16%
YTD
8.29%
6M
10.61%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMTM vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
9.16%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
8.29%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and SPVM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012

0.58

The correlation between MMTM and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MMTM vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMTM
SPVM

Technology

29.5%
5.3%

Financial Services

16.0%
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
6.3%

Healthcare

10.8%
6.3%

Communication Services

7.7%
6.6%

Industrials

7.6%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.9%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.9%

Utilities

2.6%
14.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.8%

Energy

1.7%
8.7%

Technology

MMTM
29.5%
SPVM
5.3%

Financial Services

MMTM
16.0%
SPVM
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MMTM
12.4%
SPVM
6.3%

Healthcare

MMTM
10.8%
SPVM
6.3%

Communication Services

MMTM
7.7%
SPVM
6.6%

Industrials

MMTM
7.6%
SPVM
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

MMTM
6.7%
SPVM
4.9%

Real Estate

MMTM
3.1%
SPVM
1.9%

Utilities

MMTM
2.6%
SPVM
14.2%

Basic Materials

MMTM
2.0%
SPVM
1.8%

Energy

MMTM
1.7%
SPVM
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMTM vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMTM vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMTMSPVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.29

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

16.33

-5.18

MMTM vs. SPVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the SPVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and SPVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMTMSPVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.43

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.60

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.61

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.63

+0.22

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and SPVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTMSPVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-45.35%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-6.57%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-18.66%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-19.48%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-45.35%

+11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.70%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-4.99%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.72%

+0.46%

Volatility

MMTM vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 2.35%, while Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTMSPVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.79%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

7.48%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

11.63%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

16.77%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

19.57%

-0.92%

MMTM vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMTM vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than SPVM's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.91%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMTM and SPVM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPVM has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs SPVM's -45.35%.

On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 15.00% vs 11.89% for SPVM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.

MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMTM and SPVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer