MMTM vs. SEIM
MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) and SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. MMTM is passively managed, while SEIM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMTM returned 22.46%/yr vs 29.67%/yr for SEIM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMTM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIM.
Performance
MMTM vs. SEIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than SEIM's 18.91% return.
MMTM
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
SEIM
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 18.91%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMTM vs. SEIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 9.16% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | 2.02% |
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 18.91% | 20.20% | 39.12% | 16.25% | -2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMTM and SEIM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between MMTM and SEIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
MMTM vs. SEIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMTM
SEIM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
MMTM
SEIM
Financial Services
MMTM
SEIM
Consumer Cyclical
MMTM
SEIM
Healthcare
MMTM
SEIM
Communication Services
MMTM
SEIM
Industrials
MMTM
SEIM
Consumer Defensive
MMTM
SEIM
Real Estate
MMTM
SEIM
Utilities
MMTM
SEIM
Basic Materials
MMTM
SEIM
Energy
MMTM
SEIM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMTM vs. SEIM — Risk / Return Rank
MMTM
SEIM
MMTM vs. SEIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMTM | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.68 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 16.18 | -5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMTM | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.28 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.19 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
MMTM vs. SEIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, which is greater than SEIM's maximum drawdown of -22.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and SEIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMTM | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -22.17% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | -10.07% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | -22.17% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -0.33% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.98% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 2.29% | -0.11% |
Volatility
MMTM vs. SEIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 2.35%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMTM | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 4.68% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 13.33% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 16.28% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 18.86% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 18.86% | -0.21% |
MMTM vs. SEIM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MMTM vs. SEIM - Dividend Comparison
MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than SEIM's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.89% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMTM and SEIM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEIM has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs SEIM's -22.17%.
On 3-year performance, SEIM leads with 29.67% vs 22.46% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIM has performed better with a 29.67% return vs 22.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SEIM.
MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.15% for SEIM.
SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMTM and SEIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer