MMTM vs. PXI
MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index while PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MMTM returned 14.13%/yr vs 5.99%/yr for PXI. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMTM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PXI.
Performance
MMTM vs. PXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 29.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has outperformed PXI with an annualized return of 14.13%, while PXI has yielded a comparatively lower 5.99% annualized return.
MMTM
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
PXI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 21.82%
- YTD
- 29.33%
- 1Y
- 36.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.30%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
MMTM vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 4.87% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 29.33% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMTM and PXI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MMTM and PXI has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MMTM vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMTM
PXI
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
MMTM
PXI
-
Financial Services
MMTM
PXI
Consumer Cyclical
MMTM
PXI
-
Healthcare
MMTM
PXI
-
Communication Services
MMTM
PXI
-
Industrials
MMTM
PXI
Consumer Defensive
MMTM
PXI
-
Real Estate
MMTM
PXI
-
Utilities
MMTM
PXI
-
Basic Materials
MMTM
PXI
Energy
MMTM
PXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMTM vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank
MMTM
PXI
MMTM vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMTM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.99 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 8.17 | -2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMTM vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and PXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMTM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -85.08% | +51.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | -12.40% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | -30.74% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | -33.47% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.85% | -79.55% | +45.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -5.78% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -29.31% | +25.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 4.52% | -1.99% |
Volatility
MMTM vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 5.47%, while Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMTM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 6.64% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 17.57% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 22.32% | -7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 33.07% | -14.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 36.97% | -18.30% |
MMTM vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMTM vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison
MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than PXI's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.89% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMTM and PXI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to MMTM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs PXI's -85.08%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 14.13% vs 5.99% for PXI. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 14.13% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.89% for MMTM.
MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.60% for PXI.
PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMTM and PXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer