PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMSD vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSD achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.57% return.


MMSD

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.63%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMSD and ZMUN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMSD vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSD
MMSD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MMSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ZMUN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMSDZMUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.49

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMSDZMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.63

6.46

-3.83

Drawdowns

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSD drawdown since its inception was -1.35%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSD and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMSDZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-0.09%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.02%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-0.01%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMSDZMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73%

0.54%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.76%

0.54%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.76%

0.54%

+1.22%

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMSD vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

MMSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MMSD and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MMSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.

MMSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.

They also come from different issuers: NYLI and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MMSD and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMSD and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer