PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMSD vs. COM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMSD vs. COM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSD achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than COM's 15.98% return.


MMSD

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.30%
6M
0.52%
YTD
1.30%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.06%

COM

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.62%
6M
12.15%
YTD
15.98%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.46M$1.65M$5.10M
$356.67K$303.49K$338.45K

MMSD vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMSD and COM is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMSD vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMSD
MMSD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MMSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMSD vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMSDCOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.38

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

10.17

-1.97

MMSD vs. COM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the COM Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSD and COM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMSD vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSD drawdown since its inception was -1.35%, smaller than the maximum COM drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSD and COM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMSDCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-15.95%

+14.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-7.63%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-3.70%

+3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-6.26%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

2.54%

-2.17%

Volatility

MMSD vs. COM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) is 0.74%, while Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that MMSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMSDCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

2.00%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

7.48%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83%

10.08%

-8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.80%

9.44%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.80%

9.73%

-7.93%

MMSD vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMSD vs. COM - Dividend Comparison

MMSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than COM's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.51%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%
MMSD
NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF
3.56%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMSD and COM have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COM has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to MMSD (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSD dropped -1.35% vs COM's -15.95%.

On 1-year performance, COM leads with 25.71% vs 3.02% for MMSD. On fees, MMSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MMSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COM has performed better with a 25.71% return vs 3.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for COM.

MMSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.51% for COM.

MMSD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while COM is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MMSD and 0.70% for COM.

COM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMSD and COM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer