MMSD vs. FCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMSD (NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF) and FCG (First Trust Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMSD is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by NYLI, while FCG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. MMSD is actively managed, while FCG is passively managed. Over the past year, MMSD returned 4.73% vs 32.99% for FCG. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. MMSD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FCG.

Performance

MMSD vs. FCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSD achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FCG's 27.71% return.

MMSD

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCG

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -6.03%
• YTD: 27.71%
• 6M: 20.12%
• 1Y: 32.99%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 16.52%
• 10Y*: 4.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSD vs. FCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MMSD NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF	1.26%	3.66%
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	27.71%	13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MMSD and FCG is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

MMSD vs. FCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSD

MMSD Risk / Return Rank: 83
MMSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MMSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MMSD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MMSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MMSD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FCG

FCG Risk / Return Rank: 36
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSD vs. FCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMSD	FCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	1.24	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.38	1.69	+2.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.21	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	2.54	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.49	5.56	+7.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMSD vs. FCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the FCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSD and FCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMSD	FCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75	1.24	+1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.63	-0.11	+2.74

Drawdowns

MMSD vs. FCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSD drawdown since its inception was -1.35%, smaller than the maximum FCG drawdown of -97.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSD and FCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMSD	FCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.35%	-97.20%	+95.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.35%	-13.07%	+11.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-74.25%	+74.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-65.38%	+65.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	5.95%	-5.60%

Volatility

MMSD vs. FCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF (MMSD) is 0.69%, while First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that MMSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMSD	FCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	9.60%	-8.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.43%	20.15%	-18.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73%	26.75%	-25.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.76%	33.46%	-31.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.76%	38.30%	-36.54%

MMSD vs. FCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FCG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMSD vs. FCG - Dividend Comparison

MMSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than FCG's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	2.15%	2.86%	2.76%	3.25%	3.04%	1.73%	3.82%	2.87%	1.46%	1.56%	1.70%	4.79%
MMSD NYLI MacKay Muni Short Duration ETF	3.57%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMSD and FCG in my portfolio?

MMSD and FCG have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMSD or FCG?

FCG has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to MMSD (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSD dropped -1.35% vs FCG's -97.20%.

Which ETF is better, MMSD or FCG?

On 1-year performance, FCG leads with 32.99% vs 4.73% for MMSD. On fees, MMSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MMSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMSD or FCG?

Over the 1-year period, FCG has performed better with a 32.99% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMSD or FCG?

MMSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMSD or FCG?

MMSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.15% for FCG.

What is the main difference between MMSD and FCG?

MMSD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FCG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: NYLI and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MMSD and 0.60% for FCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.