MMSC vs. KNG
MMSC (First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. MMSC is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMSC returned 22.75%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for KNG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMSC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
MMSC vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMSC achieves a 18.57% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.
MMSC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 18.57%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 45.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
MMSC vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | 18.57% | 15.45% | 22.19% | 18.76% | -30.98% | 1.01% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.20% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMSC and KNG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MMSC and KNG has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MMSC vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMSC
KNG
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Industrials
MMSC
KNG
Technology
MMSC
KNG
Healthcare
MMSC
KNG
Financial Services
MMSC
KNG
Consumer Cyclical
MMSC
KNG
Energy
MMSC
KNG
Basic Materials
MMSC
KNG
Consumer Defensive
MMSC
KNG
Utilities
MMSC
KNG
Communication Services
MMSC
KNG
-
Real Estate
MMSC
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMSC vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
MMSC
KNG
MMSC vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMSC | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 0.73 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 1.15 | +1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 0.87 | +2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 2.25 | +10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMSC | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 0.73 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.49 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MMSC vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMSC drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSC and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMSC | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.82% | -35.12% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.10% | -8.61% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.76% | -14.24% | -15.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -5.89% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -4.13% | -14.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.32% | +0.37% |
Volatility
MMSC vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that MMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMSC | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 2.29% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.22% | 7.39% | +9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.35% | 10.19% | +12.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 13.59% | +10.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 17.18% | +7.29% |
MMSC vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMSC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMSC vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMSC and KNG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMSC has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSC dropped -40.82% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 3-year performance, MMSC leads with 22.75% vs 7.06% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MMSC has performed better with a 22.75% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.
MMSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MMSC and 0.75% for KNG.
MMSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMSC and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer