PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMSC vs. IJT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMSC vs. IJT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSC achieves a 17.91% return, which is significantly higher than IJT's 15.36% return.


MMSC

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.15%
YTD
17.91%
6M
17.19%
1Y
42.14%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
10Y*

IJT

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.97%
YTD
15.36%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSC vs. IJT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
17.91%15.45%22.19%18.76%-30.98%1.01%
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
15.36%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MMSC and IJT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021

0.90

The correlation between MMSC and IJT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

MMSC vs. IJT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMSC
IJT

Industrials

27.4%
20.0%

Technology

23.4%
20.1%

Healthcare

22.2%
14.5%

Financial Services

8.1%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
9.8%

Energy

6.7%
4.9%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
2.8%

Utilities

0.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

0.5%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.2%
6.3%

Industrials

MMSC
27.4%
IJT
20.0%

Technology

MMSC
23.4%
IJT
20.1%

Healthcare

MMSC
22.2%
IJT
14.5%

Financial Services

MMSC
8.1%
IJT
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MMSC
7.2%
IJT
9.8%

Energy

MMSC
6.7%
IJT
4.9%

Basic Materials

MMSC
2.5%
IJT
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

MMSC
1.4%
IJT
2.8%

Utilities

MMSC
0.7%
IJT
1.9%

Communication Services

MMSC
0.5%
IJT
2.7%

Real Estate

MMSC
0.2%
IJT
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMSC vs. IJT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSC
MMSC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSC vs. IJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMSCIJTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

1.50

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

2.23

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.90

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.46

10.06

+1.40

MMSC vs. IJT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the IJT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSC and IJT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMSCIJTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.50

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.39

-0.10

Drawdowns

MMSC vs. IJT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSC drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum IJT drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSC and IJT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMSCIJTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-57.61%

+16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.10%

-9.08%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.76%

-27.41%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.48%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.78%

-10.31%

-8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

2.61%

+1.08%

Volatility

MMSC vs. IJT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) at 4.61%. This indicates that MMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMSCIJTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

4.61%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

12.47%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

17.56%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.46%

21.50%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.46%

23.02%

+1.44%

MMSC vs. IJT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IJT's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMSC vs. IJT - Dividend Comparison

MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.77%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMSC and IJT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMSC has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to IJT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSC dropped -40.82% vs IJT's -57.61%.

On 3-year performance, MMSC leads with 22.52% vs 14.39% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MMSC has performed better with a 22.52% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MMSC and 0.18% for IJT.

MMSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMSC and IJT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer