PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMMA vs. FTPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMMA vs. FTPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMMA achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than FTPA's 3.05% return.


MMMA

1D
0.06%
1M
1.21%
YTD
3.87%
6M
4.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTPA

1D
0.02%
1M
1.30%
YTD
3.05%
6M
3.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMMA vs. FTPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMMA and FTPA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMMA vs. FTPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MMMA vs. FTPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMMA vs. FTPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum FTPA drawdown of -2.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and FTPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMMAFTPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-2.96%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-0.60%

+0.06%

Volatility

MMMA vs. FTPA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMMAFTPADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

3.95%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.00%

3.95%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.00%

3.95%

+0.05%

MMMA vs. FTPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MMMA and FTPA have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

MMMA vs. FTPA - Dividend Comparison

MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FTPA's 2.06% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MMMA and FTPA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMMA and FTPA have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

FTPA has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.94% for MMMA.

They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Franklin Templeton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMMA and FTPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer