MMMA vs. FTPA
MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) and FTPA (Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
MMMA vs. FTPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMMA achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than FTPA's 3.05% return.
MMMA
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTPA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMMA vs. FTPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 3.87% | 0.35% |
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 3.05% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMMA and FTPA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMMA vs. FTPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMMA vs. FTPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum FTPA drawdown of -2.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and FTPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMMA | FTPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -2.96% | +0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -0.60% | +0.06% |
Volatility
MMMA vs. FTPA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMMA | FTPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.95% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 3.95% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 3.95% | +0.05% |
MMMA vs. FTPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MMMA and FTPA have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
MMMA vs. FTPA - Dividend Comparison
MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FTPA's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 2.06% | 0.47% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 1.94% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMMA and FTPA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMMA and FTPA have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
FTPA has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.94% for MMMA.
They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Franklin Templeton.
Find the right allocation for MMMA and FTPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer