MMM vs. CINF
MMM (3M Company) and CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) are both stocks. MMM operates in Conglomerates (Industrials), while CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, MMM returned 5.05%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for CINF. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MMM vs. CINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than CINF's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed CINF with an annualized return of 5.05%, while CINF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
MMM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 20.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.42%
CINF
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.60M | $174.30M | $143.71M | |
MMM 3M Company | $851.12M | $623.50M | $620.01M |
MMM vs. CINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMM 3M Company | 11.17% | 26.36% | 46.13% | -3.33% | -29.63% | 4.85% | 2.77% | -4.29% | -16.90% | 34.90% |
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 10.03% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMM and CINF is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.40 |
The correlation between MMM and CINF shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MMM:
$90.91B
CINF:
$27.27B
MMM:
$5.60
CINF:
$28.19
MMM:
31.49
CINF:
6.30
MMM:
3.75
CINF:
1.50
MMM:
$25.18B
CINF:
$13.95B
MMM:
$9.92B
CINF:
$4.91B
MMM:
$5.45B
CINF:
$2.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMM vs. CINF — Risk / Return Rank
MMM
CINF
MMM vs. CINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMM | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.22 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | 5.31 | -2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMM vs. CINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, roughly equal to the maximum CINF drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and CINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMM | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.10% | -59.64% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.77% | -10.46% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.66% | -20.03% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.23% | -35.77% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.10% | -58.12% | -0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -7.47% | +4.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -12.16% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 4.37% | +4.31% |
Volatility
MMM vs. CINF - Volatility Comparison
3M Company (MMM) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) have volatilities of 9.67% and 10.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMM | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.67% | 10.14% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.73% | 17.07% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.96% | 21.21% | +5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.62% | 25.76% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 28.97% | -2.26% |
Dividends
MMM vs. CINF - Dividend Comparison
MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than CINF's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.04% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
MMM 3M Company | 1.71% | 1.82% | 16.27% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% |
Financials
MMM vs. CINF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Cincinnati Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MMM vs. CINF - Profitability Comparison
MMM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.68B and revenue of 6.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.3%.
CINF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MMM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 984.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
CINF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MMM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 933.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
CINF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MMM and CINF have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CINF has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to MMM (9.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMM dropped -59.10% vs CINF's -59.64%.
CINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMM and CINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer