MMLG vs. QCLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMLG (First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. MMLG is actively managed, while QCLR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMLG returned 21.41%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for QCLR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMLG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLR.

Performance

MMLG vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMLG achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's 1.40% return.

MMLG

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 4.76%
• 6M: 4.14%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: —

QCLR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 11.39%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMLG vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF	4.76%	17.28%	25.96%	45.21%	-39.18%	-2.23%
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	1.40%	11.27%	20.27%	28.87%	-18.87%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MMLG and QCLR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.81

The correlation between MMLG and QCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

MMLG vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MMLG	QCLR
Technology	39.5%	53.8%
Financial Services	13.2%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	12.2%
Industrials	10.5%	2.9%
Healthcare	9.2%	4.2%
Communication Services	7.9%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	7.7%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.1%
Energy	1.3%	0.6%
Utilities	1.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

MMLG vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMLG

MMLG Risk / Return Rank: 23
MMLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
MMLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MMLG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MMLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MMLG Martin Ratio Rank: 20

QCLR

QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 29
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMLG vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMLG	QCLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.17	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.60	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.22	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	1.12	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	4.02	-1.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMLG vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMLG and QCLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMLG	QCLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.17	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.67	-0.21

Drawdowns

MMLG vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and QCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMLG	QCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.97%	-21.77%	-24.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.89%	-10.22%	-9.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.57%	-13.58%	-12.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-0.89%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-6.20%	-8.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.91%	2.84%	+4.07%

Volatility

MMLG vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 0.45%. This indicates that MMLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMLG	QCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	0.45%	+3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	7.24%	+6.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.22%	9.82%	+8.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.94%	12.42%	+12.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.54%	12.42%	+12.12%

MMLG vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMLG vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

MMLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	14.68%	14.89%	8.89%	0.47%	0.27%	1.64%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMLG and QCLR in my portfolio?

MMLG and QCLR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMLG or QCLR?

MMLG has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to QCLR (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMLG dropped -45.97% vs QCLR's -21.77%.

Which ETF is better, MMLG or QCLR?

On 3-year performance, MMLG leads with 21.41% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, QCLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMLG or QCLR?

Over the 3-year period, MMLG has performed better with a 21.41% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMLG or QCLR?

QCLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MMLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMLG or QCLR?

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.00% for MMLG.

What is the main difference between MMLG and QCLR?

MMLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MMLG and 0.60% for QCLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.