MMLG vs. QCLN
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN).
MMLG and QCLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MMLG is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jul 21, 2020. QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007.
Performance
MMLG vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMLG vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | -11.52% | 17.28% | 25.96% | 45.21% | -39.18% | 13.23% | 20.61% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 4.23% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -30.37% | -3.21% | 94.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMLG achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 4.23% return.
MMLG
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -11.52%
- 6M
- -13.49%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 62.76%
- 3Y*
- -3.26%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMLG vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMLG vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
MMLG
QCLN
MMLG vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMLG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.67 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.28 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 3.81 | -3.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 11.86 | -9.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMLG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.67 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | -0.19 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.14 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMLG and QCLN is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MMLG vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
MMLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
MMLG vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and QCLN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMLG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.97% | -76.18% | +30.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -16.18% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.97% | -69.49% | +23.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.49% | -46.16% | +29.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -43.54% | +28.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 5.20% | +1.22% |
Volatility
MMLG vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) is 7.69%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that MMLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMLG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 14.18% | -6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 27.32% | -12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.87% | 37.76% | -12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 37.87% | -12.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 34.63% | -9.89% |