PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMKT vs. MUST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MMKT vs. MUST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MMKT vs. MUST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
0.84%4.13%1.21%
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
0.02%4.92%-1.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than MUST's 0.02% return.


MMKT

1D
0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUST

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
0.02%
6M
1.52%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMKT vs. MUST - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MUST's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MMKT vs. MUST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

MUST
MUST Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUST Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUST Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMKT vs. MUST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMKTMUSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

15.67

0.81

+14.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

51.57

1.10

+50.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

12.51

1.16

+11.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

93.84

1.17

+92.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

761.18

4.26

+756.92

MMKT vs. MUST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMKT Sharpe Ratio is 15.67, which is higher than the MUST Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMKT and MUST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMKTMUSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67

0.81

+14.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

17.44

0.51

+16.93

Correlation

The correlation between MMKT and MUST is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MMKT vs. MUST - Dividend Comparison

MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than MUST's 3.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.85%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
3.29%3.28%3.13%2.51%1.76%1.62%2.33%2.70%0.55%

Drawdowns

MMKT vs. MUST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum MUST drawdown of -13.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and MUST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MMKTMUSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-13.83%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-4.56%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.49%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.44%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.25%

-1.24%

Volatility

MMKT vs. MUST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) is 0.08%, while Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that MMKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MMKTMUSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

1.84%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.16%

3.43%

-3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25%

6.60%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.24%

5.38%

-5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.24%

5.60%

-5.36%