MMK vs. BIL
MMK (State Street Prime Money Market ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMK is a Money Market fund actively managed by State Street, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. MMK is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
MMK vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MMK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
MMK vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MMK State Street Prime Money Market ETF | 1.41% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMK and BIL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMK vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
MMK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIL
MMK vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Prime Money Market ETF (MMK) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMK | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 87.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 355.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2,818.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMK vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMK drawdown since its inception was -0.01%, smaller than the maximum BIL drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMK and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMK | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.78% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
MMK vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMK | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18% | 0.20% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.18% | 0.26% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.18% | 0.26% | -0.08% |
MMK vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MMK vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
MMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BIL's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.82% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
MMK State Street Prime Money Market ETF | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMK and BIL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MMK.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 1.38% for MMK.
MMK is categorized as Money Market, while BIL is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MMK and 0.14% for BIL.
Find the right allocation for MMK and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer