MMK vs. SGVT
MMK (State Street Prime Money Market ETF) and SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for SGVT.
Performance
MMK vs. SGVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MMK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMK vs. SGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MMK State Street Prime Money Market ETF | 1.41% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMK and SGVT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMK vs. SGVT — Risk / Return Rank
MMK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGVT
MMK vs. SGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Prime Money Market ETF (MMK) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMK | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 29.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 138.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,104.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMK vs. SGVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMK drawdown since its inception was -0.01%, smaller than the maximum SGVT drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMK and SGVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMK | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.03% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
MMK vs. SGVT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMK | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18% | 0.22% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.18% | 0.22% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.18% | 0.22% | -0.04% |
MMK vs. SGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SGVT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMK vs. SGVT - Dividend Comparison
MMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SGVT's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MMK State Street Prime Money Market ETF | 1.38% | 0.00% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.26% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMK and SGVT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.38% for MMK.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MMK and 0.28% for SGVT.
Find the right allocation for MMK and SGVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer