MMIT vs. GUMI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MMIT returned 6.45% vs 3.18% for GUMI. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GUMI.

Performance

MMIT vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMIT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than GUMI's 1.06% return.

MMIT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: —

GUMI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 3.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIT vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	1.40%	5.03%	0.57%
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	1.06%	3.39%	1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MMIT and GUMI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024	0.29

The correlation between MMIT and GUMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MMIT vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIT

MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 70
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

GUMI

GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 93
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIT vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMIT	GUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.92	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	4.70	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.64	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	8.93	-6.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	37.83	-29.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMIT vs. GUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the GUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIT and GUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMIT	GUMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.92	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	3.29	-2.66

Drawdowns

MMIT vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and GUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMIT	GUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-0.48%	-11.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.59%	-0.36%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.04%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-0.05%	-2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	0.08%	+0.68%

Volatility

MMIT vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison

IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) at 0.25%. This indicates that MMIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMIT	GUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	0.25%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.66%	0.55%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	1.09%	+1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.54%	0.99%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	0.99%	+3.31%

MMIT vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMIT vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison

MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than GUMI's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	2.77%	2.95%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.57%	3.54%	3.76%	3.46%	2.30%	1.81%	2.59%	4.14%	2.46%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMIT and GUMI in my portfolio?

MMIT and GUMI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMIT or GUMI?

MMIT has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to GUMI (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIT dropped -12.28% vs GUMI's -0.48%.

Which ETF is better, MMIT or GUMI?

On 1-year performance, MMIT leads with 6.45% vs 3.18% for GUMI. On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GUMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMIT or GUMI?

Over the 1-year period, MMIT has performed better with a 6.45% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMIT or GUMI?

GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMIT or GUMI?

MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.77% for GUMI.

What is the main difference between MMIT and GUMI?

They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.16% for GUMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.