MMIN vs. ZMUN
MMIN (IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - MMIN tracks the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal All Insured Bond Index while ZMUN tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMIN charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
MMIN vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMIN achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than ZMUN's 1.57% return.
MMIN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMIN vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMIN IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF | 2.32% | 1.90% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMIN and ZMUN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMIN vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
MMIN
ZMUN
MMIN vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMIN | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMIN | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 6.46 | -6.08 |
Drawdowns
MMIN vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMIN drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIN and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMIN | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -0.09% | -16.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.02% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -0.01% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility
MMIN vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMIN | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 0.54% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 0.54% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 0.54% | +6.43% |
MMIN vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMIN has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMIN vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
MMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIN IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF | 4.12% | 4.07% | 3.96% | 3.73% | 2.93% | 1.72% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 0.47% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMIN and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIN.
MMIN has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
MMIN tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal All Insured Bond Index, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIN and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for MMIN and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer