PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMIN vs. JMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MMIN vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MMIN vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
0.02%4.65%0.93%7.45%-11.20%1.35%7.47%8.08%2.73%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
-0.44%4.34%1.88%5.96%-7.43%1.58%4.98%8.37%2.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMIN achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than JMUB's -0.44% return.


MMIN

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
0.02%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*

JMUB

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMIN vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIN has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MMIN vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIN
MMIN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIN vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMINJMUBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

1.07

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.11

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.49

4.20

-0.72

MMIN vs. JMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the JMUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIN and JMUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMINJMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.07

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.36

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.69

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between MMIN and JMUB is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MMIN vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison

MMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than JMUB's 3.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
4.48%4.07%3.96%3.73%2.93%1.72%2.21%2.75%2.78%0.47%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.60%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%0.00%

Drawdowns

MMIN vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIN drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, which is greater than JMUB's maximum drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIN and JMUB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MMINJMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-12.50%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.16%

-3.47%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.87%

-12.06%

-4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-2.26%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-2.54%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

0.92%

+0.59%

Volatility

MMIN vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison

IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) at 1.23%. This indicates that MMIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MMINJMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

1.23%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

1.64%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.28%

3.41%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

3.30%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

4.17%

+2.86%