MMID vs. QIDX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMID charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.

Performance

MMID vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than QIDX's 8.20% return.

MMID

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 3.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QIDX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 6.78%
• 1Y: 11.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMID vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF	4.05%	0.62%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	8.20%	-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MMID and QIDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

MMID vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMID

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 35
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMID vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMID	QIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.63	—

Drawdowns

MMID vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum QIDX drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and QIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMID	QIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.93%	-14.99%	+7.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.95%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-2.24%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMID	QIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	11.08%	+2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	14.52%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.54%	14.52%	-0.98%

MMID vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMID vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than QIDX's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF	0.48%	0.28%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.85%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMID and QIDX in my portfolio?

MMID and QIDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MMID or QIDX?

On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMID or QIDX?

QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMID or QIDX?

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.48% for MMID.

What is the main difference between MMID and QIDX?

They also come from different issuers: MFS and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.50% for QIDX.