PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMID vs. GRNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMID vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 26.11% return.


MMID

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.95%
YTD
2.28%
6M
2.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRNJ

1D
-1.17%
1M
8.92%
YTD
26.11%
6M
25.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMID vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMID and GRNJ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMID vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MMID vs. GRNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMIDGRNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

2.35

-1.93

Drawdowns

MMID vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum GRNJ drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and GRNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMIDGRNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-17.32%

+9.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-1.17%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-4.13%

+1.99%

Volatility

MMID vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMIDGRNJDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

29.93%

-16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

29.93%

-16.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.57%

29.93%

-16.36%

MMID vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMID vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MMID and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MMID is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMID is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.

MMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

They also come from different issuers: MFS and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.75% for GRNJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMID and GRNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer