MMCA vs. ZMUN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MMCA (IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MMCA is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMCA charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.

Performance

MMCA vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMCA achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.81% return.

MMCA

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 6.17%
• 3Y*: 4.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMUN

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMCA vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	1.27%	1.71%
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	1.81%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MMCA and ZMUN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

MMCA vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMCA

MMCA Risk / Return Rank: 71
MMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

ZMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMCA vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMCA	ZMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.26	—	—

Drawdowns

MMCA vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMCA drawdown since its inception was -16.04%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMCA and ZMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMCA	ZMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.04%	-0.10%	-15.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	0.00%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-0.01%	-7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMCA	ZMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55%	0.54%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.59%	0.54%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.59%	0.54%	+3.05%

MMCA vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMCA has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMCA vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

MMCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.27%	3.39%	3.66%	3.57%	2.90%	0.05%
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	2.28%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMCA and ZMUN in my portfolio?

MMCA and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MMCA or ZMUN?

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMCA or ZMUN?

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MMCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMCA or ZMUN?

MMCA has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.

What is the main difference between MMCA and ZMUN?

They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MMCA and 0.30% for ZMUN.