PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMCA vs. FCAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MMCA vs. FCAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) and First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MMCA vs. FCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MMCA
IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF
-0.43%5.74%1.70%5.77%-12.15%0.01%
FCAL
First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF
0.00%3.19%1.90%6.08%-9.50%0.08%

Returns By Period


MMCA

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
1.02%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
10Y*

FCAL

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.94%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMCA vs. FCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMCA has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FCAL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MMCA vs. FCAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMCA
MMCA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FCAL
FCAL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMCA vs. FCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) and First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMCAFCALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

0.93

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

1.21

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.97

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.09

2.69

+3.40

MMCA vs. FCAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the FCAL Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMCA and FCAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMCAFCALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.93

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.46

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between MMCA and FCAL is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MMCA vs. FCAL - Dividend Comparison

MMCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than FCAL's 3.32% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMCA
IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF
3.67%3.39%3.66%3.57%2.90%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCAL
First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF
3.32%3.22%2.99%2.74%2.38%2.03%2.11%2.68%2.99%1.30%

Drawdowns

MMCA vs. FCAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMCA drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, which is greater than FCAL's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMCA and FCAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MMCAFCALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-14.81%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-4.30%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-2.08%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-3.40%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.55%

-0.73%

Volatility

MMCA vs. FCAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) is 1.23%, while First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that MMCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MMCAFCALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.48%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

1.90%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

4.49%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

4.26%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.64%

5.29%

-1.65%