MLXIX vs. GLEIX
MLXIX (Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund) and GLEIX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MLXIX returned 21.54%/yr vs 24.87%/yr for GLEIX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. MLXIX charges 1.43%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for GLEIX.
Performance
MLXIX vs. GLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 32.37% return, which is significantly higher than GLEIX's 26.38% return.
MLXIX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 20.63%
- YTD
- 32.37%
- 1Y
- 18.43%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.45%
GLEIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 17.52%
- YTD
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 30.14%
- 5Y*
- 24.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MLXIX vs. GLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 32.37% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | 12.05% | -18.48% | 3.53% |
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 26.38% | 5.30% | 58.18% | 15.08% | 18.96% | 38.31% | -17.46% | 16.95% | -15.17% | 6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLXIX and GLEIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between MLXIX and GLEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLXIX vs. GLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
MLXIX
GLEIX
MLXIX vs. GLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLXIX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 4.13 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 9.47 | -7.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLXIX vs. GLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, which is greater than GLEIX's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and GLEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLXIX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.78% | -59.27% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.32% | -7.29% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -17.07% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.14% | -21.89% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.14% | -3.00% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -8.45% | -14.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.47% | 3.17% | +4.30% |
Volatility
MLXIX vs. GLEIX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) at 5.45%. This indicates that MLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLXIX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 5.45% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 11.97% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.85% | 14.97% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 20.51% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 25.34% | +2.77% |
MLXIX vs. GLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than GLEIX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLXIX vs. GLEIX - Dividend Comparison
MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than GLEIX's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 8.18% | 10.00% | 25.43% | 10.22% | 4.70% | 8.41% | 4.17% | 4.83% | 3.54% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.81% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLXIX and GLEIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLXIX has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to GLEIX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLXIX dropped -76.78% vs GLEIX's -59.27%.
GLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLXIX and GLEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer