MLTX vs. QVCGA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MLTX (MoonLake Immunotherapeutics) and QVCGA (QVC Group Inc) are both stocks. MLTX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while QVCGA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical).

Performance

MLTX vs. QVCGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MLTX

• 1D: 5.30%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 41.81%
• 6M: 26.37%
• 1Y: -57.72%
• 3Y*: -10.04%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: —

QVCGA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLTX vs. QVCGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MLTX MoonLake Immunotherapeutics	1.52%
QVCGA QVC Group Inc	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MLTX : $1.33B QVCGA : $2.75M
EPS MLTX : -$3.90 QVCGA : -$302.09
Total Revenue (TTM) MLTX : $0.00 QVCGA : $9.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) MLTX : -$1.49M QVCGA : $2.89B
EBITDA (TTM) MLTX : -$179.84M QVCGA : $789.00M

Return for Risk

MLTX vs. QVCGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLTX

MLTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
MLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

QVCGA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLTX vs. QVCGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLTX	QVCGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	—	—

Drawdowns

MLTX vs. QVCGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLTX drawdown since its inception was -90.22%, which is greater than QVCGA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLTX and QVCGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLTX	QVCGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.22%	0.00%	-90.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-89.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.73%	0.00%	-70.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.34%	0.00%	-29.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	63.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLTX	QVCGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.66%	0.00%	+115.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.15%	0.00%	+91.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.34%	0.00%	+86.34%

Dividends

MLTX vs. QVCGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MLTX nor QVCGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials