PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPZX vs. FMGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPZX achieves a 19.69% return, which is significantly higher than FMGIX's 6.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLPZX having a 9.78% annualized return and FMGIX not far ahead at 9.89%.


MLPZX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
19.69%
6M
17.16%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
19.22%
10Y*
9.78%

FMGIX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
6.91%
6M
7.37%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
19.69%7.88%24.54%20.71%25.10%44.98%-25.49%14.50%-12.92%-8.42%
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
6.91%22.67%34.26%4.86%-9.46%13.84%-1.36%28.00%-6.62%20.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPZX and FMGIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2012

0.36

The correlation between MLPZX and FMGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPZX vs. FMGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPZX
MLPZX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MLPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FMGIX
FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPZXFMGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

1.79

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

5.59

+6.55

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the FMGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPZX and FMGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPZXFMGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.23

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.42

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.19

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.23

+0.09

Drawdowns

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPZX drawdown since its inception was -77.56%, which is greater than FMGIX's maximum drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPZX and FMGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPZXFMGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.56%

-57.57%

-19.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-7.11%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-20.56%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-26.61%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.62%

-57.57%

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-5.08%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-5.34%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.27%

-0.35%

Volatility

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) at 3.85%. This indicates that MLPZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPZXFMGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

3.85%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

8.42%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

10.31%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

28.52%

-11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.85%

52.58%

-26.73%

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPZX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FMGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPZX vs. FMGIX - Dividend Comparison

MLPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than FMGIX's 31.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
31.45%33.65%48.77%4.79%3.98%2.63%2.38%2.63%3.09%3.15%2.83%2.79%
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
6.10%6.87%5.92%7.19%7.98%9.19%16.57%13.12%13.27%10.70%9.79%10.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPZX and FMGIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPZX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to FMGIX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPZX dropped -77.56% vs FMGIX's -57.57%.

MLPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPZX and FMGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer