PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPR vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MLPR vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MLPR vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
24.29%9.83%-3.64%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.84%-26.70%-16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -35.84% return.


MLPR

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.32%
YTD
24.29%
6M
30.59%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
32.28%
5Y*
32.14%
10Y*

TSLG

1D
9.07%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MLPR vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MLPR vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPR
MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPR vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPRTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

0.32

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

1.26

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.59

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.44

1.27

+0.18

MLPR vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPR and TSLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPRTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

0.32

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

-0.44

+1.37

Correlation

The correlation between MLPR and TSLG is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MLPR vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, less than TSLG's 10.20% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
9.14%10.85%9.57%10.08%7.49%10.69%4.21%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
10.20%6.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MLPR vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and TSLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPRTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.98%

-82.86%

+33.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.45%

-50.92%

+26.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-67.59%

+63.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-58.04%

+48.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.53%

23.82%

-13.29%

Volatility

MLPR vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) is 4.93%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 22.28%. This indicates that MLPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MLPRTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

22.28%

-17.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

59.35%

-45.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.04%

110.61%

-82.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.60%

119.00%

-89.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.01%

119.00%

-84.99%