MLPR vs. BSMW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%), while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MLPR returned 32.14%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MLPR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.

Performance

MLPR vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 29.81% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.30% return.

MLPR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 29.81%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 32.14%
• 5Y*: 26.89%
• 10Y*: —

BSMW

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 1.59%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPR vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	29.81%	9.83%	31.57%	26.25%
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	1.30%	3.42%	-0.35%	7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPR and BSMW is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023	-0.06

The correlation between MLPR and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLPR vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 45

BSMW

BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 67
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPR vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPR	BSMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.48	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.56	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.50	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.39	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.53	7.53	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPR vs. BSMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the BSMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPR and BSMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPR	BSMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	2.48	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.69	+0.24

Drawdowns

MLPR vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and BSMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPR	BSMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.98%	-7.57%	-41.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.97%	-2.92%	-11.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.45%	-7.34%	-17.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.07%	-0.98%	-6.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.94%	-1.72%	-7.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	0.92%	+3.40%

Volatility

MLPR vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.93%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPR	BSMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	0.93%	+7.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	1.98%	+12.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.64%	2.82%	+17.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.52%	5.00%	+24.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.75%	5.00%	+28.75%

MLPR vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPR vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison

MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, more than BSMW's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	3.20%	3.24%	3.48%	2.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	9.00%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPR and BSMW in my portfolio?

MLPR and BSMW have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPR or BSMW?

MLPR has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPR dropped -48.98% vs BSMW's -7.57%.

Which ETF is better, MLPR or BSMW?

On 3-year performance, MLPR leads with 32.14% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPR or BSMW?

Over the 3-year period, MLPR has performed better with a 32.14% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPR or BSMW?

BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPR or BSMW?

MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 9.00%, compared with 3.20% for BSMW.

What is the main difference between MLPR and BSMW?

MLPR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%), while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MLPR and 0.18% for BSMW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.