DHIVX vs. NMFIX
DHIVX (Centre Global Infrastructure Fund) and NMFIX (Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DHIVX returned 9.08%/yr vs 7.22%/yr for NMFIX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DHIVX charges 1.57%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for NMFIX.
Performance
DHIVX vs. NMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHIVX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than NMFIX's 9.89% return.
DHIVX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.78%
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 16.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DHIVX vs. NMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHIVX Centre Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.29% | 16.30% | 20.25% | 5.34% | -3.28% | 7.51% | -7.17% | 25.27% | -4.07% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 9.89% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHIVX and NMFIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DHIVX and NMFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHIVX vs. NMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
DHIVX
NMFIX
DHIVX vs. NMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHIVX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.20 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 6.28 | -1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHIVX vs. NMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHIVX drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, roughly equal to the maximum NMFIX drawdown of -34.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHIVX and NMFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHIVX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -34.93% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -7.20% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.08% | -11.21% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -22.76% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -3.02% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -5.28% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.51% | +0.18% |
Volatility
DHIVX vs. NMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) at 2.63%. This indicates that DHIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHIVX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 2.63% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 11.46% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 12.86% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 13.82% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 15.29% | -0.67% |
DHIVX vs. NMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHIVX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than NMFIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHIVX vs. NMFIX - Dividend Comparison
DHIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than NMFIX's 5.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHIVX Centre Global Infrastructure Fund | 3.21% | 3.66% | 2.54% | 1.60% | 1.85% | 1.70% | 2.43% | 2.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.45% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHIVX and NMFIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHIVX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to NMFIX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHIVX dropped -36.18% vs NMFIX's -34.93%.
DHIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHIVX and NMFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer