MLPNX vs. PFFA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MLPNX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund) and PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) are both funds - MLPNX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Invesco, while PFFA is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past 5 years, MLPNX returned 27.39%/yr vs 5.69%/yr for PFFA. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPNX charges 1.34%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for PFFA.

Performance

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPNX achieves a 27.66% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 1.63% return.

MLPNX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 26.09%
• YTD: 27.66%
• 1Y: 30.26%
• 3Y*: 30.10%
• 5Y*: 27.39%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

PFFA

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: 0.05%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 5.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	27.66%	4.56%	47.50%	25.29%	38.54%	55.22%	-45.69%	8.98%	-15.02%
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF	1.63%	8.22%	16.11%	26.45%	-20.91%	23.53%	-7.87%	31.99%	-7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPNX and PFFA is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.37

The correlation between MLPNX and PFFA shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLPNX vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPNX

MLPNX Risk / Return Rank: 67
MLPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MLPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MLPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
MLPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MLPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PFFA

PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 34
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPNX	PFFA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.05	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	1.52	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.19	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	1.20	+2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	3.71	+4.89

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPNX and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPNX drawdown since its inception was -87.31%, which is greater than PFFA's maximum drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPNX and PFFA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPNX	PFFA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.31%	-70.52%	-16.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-6.49%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-12.15%	-7.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.27%	-22.70%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.04%	-2.88%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.36%	-6.60%	-18.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	2.10%	+1.51%

Volatility

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 2.74%. This indicates that MLPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPNX	PFFA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	2.74%	+3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.75%	6.30%	+6.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	7.42%	+9.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.96%	11.58%	+13.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.68%	31.65%	+4.03%

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPNX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPNX vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

MLPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than PFFA's 9.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	4.61%	5.31%	4.14%	5.58%	6.44%	8.34%	21.57%	13.90%	13.34%	20.56%	7.75%	9.09%
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF	9.85%	9.47%	9.18%	9.56%	10.75%	7.64%	8.54%	10.02%	5.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPNX and PFFA in my portfolio?

MLPNX and PFFA have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPNX or PFFA?

MLPNX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to PFFA (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPNX dropped -87.31% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.