MLPLX vs. OPGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX).
MLPLX is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Feb 6, 2012. OPGSX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jul 18, 1983.
Performance
MLPLX vs. OPGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPLX vs. OPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPLX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A | 24.85% | 4.36% | 47.10% | 25.02% | 38.31% | 55.18% | -46.03% | 8.79% | -21.09% | -11.18% |
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 0.44% | 131.03% | 13.05% | 6.35% | -16.86% | -2.75% | 36.15% | 46.37% | -13.15% | 17.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPLX achieves a 24.85% return, which is significantly higher than OPGSX's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPLX has underperformed OPGSX with an annualized return of 12.01%, while OPGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.37% annualized return.
MLPLX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 24.85%
- 6M
- 28.08%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.02%
- 5Y*
- 33.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
OPGSX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -23.68%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- 1Y
- 82.38%
- 3Y*
- 36.20%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 17.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPLX vs. OPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPLX has a 17.25% expense ratio, which is higher than OPGSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPLX vs. OPGSX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPLX
OPGSX
MLPLX vs. OPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPLX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 2.20 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 2.54 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.36 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.22 | -2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 12.84 | -10.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPLX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.20 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.32 | 0.63 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.25 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPLX and OPGSX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MLPLX vs. OPGSX - Dividend Comparison
MLPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than OPGSX's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPLX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A | 4.78% | 5.70% | 4.42% | 5.92% | 6.79% | 8.75% | 22.54% | 14.33% | 13.67% | 9.68% | 7.88% | 9.20% |
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 0.43% | 0.43% | 0.86% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 3.56% | 1.55% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 2.78% | 7.21% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLPLX vs. OPGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPLX drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than OPGSX's maximum drawdown of -80.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPLX and OPGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPLX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.76% | -80.04% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -29.01% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -47.09% | +19.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.02% | -47.09% | -37.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -24.65% | +23.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -29.33% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 7.27% | +0.90% |
Volatility
MLPLX vs. OPGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) is 4.20%, while Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that MLPLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPLX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 15.32% | -11.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 35.01% | -23.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.04% | 43.01% | -20.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 32.97% | -7.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 32.93% | +2.86% |