MLPI vs. SRV
MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) are both funds - MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos, while SRV is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by NXG. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SRV.
Performance
MLPI vs. SRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 31.93% return.
MLPI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRV
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 31.93%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 41.64%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
MLPI vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 17.58% | 0.56% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 31.93% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPI and SRV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPI vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank
MLPI
SRV
MLPI vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPI | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.49 | -0.01 | +3.50 |
Drawdowns
MLPI vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and SRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPI | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -92.93% | +87.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -7.50% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -48.51% | +47.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility
MLPI vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPI | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 18.82% | -5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 26.43% | -13.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 38.29% | -25.24% |
MLPI vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPI vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison
MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, less than SRV's 15.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 6.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 15.39% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPI and SRV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MLPI and SRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer