MLPI vs. MLPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos, while MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%). MLPI is actively managed, while MLPR is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MLPR.

Performance

MLPI vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 29.81% return.

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 29.81%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 32.14%
• 5Y*: 26.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPI vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	29.81%	0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPI and MLPR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

MLPI vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPI vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPI	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.49	0.93	+2.55

Drawdowns

MLPI vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and MLPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPI	MLPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-48.98%	+43.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-7.07%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-8.94%	+7.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPI	MLPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	20.64%	-7.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	29.52%	-16.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.05%	33.75%	-20.70%

MLPI vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPI vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, less than MLPR's 9.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	9.00%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPI and MLPR in my portfolio?

MLPI and MLPR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPI or MLPR?

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPI or MLPR?

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPI or MLPR?

MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 9.00%, compared with 6.04% for MLPI.

What is the main difference between MLPI and MLPR?

MLPI is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.95% for MLPR.