MLPI vs. BTCI
Compare and contrast key facts about Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI).
MLPI and BTCI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Dec 17, 2025. BTCI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Oct 16, 2024.
Performance
MLPI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 17.27% | 0.56% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -20.30% | 2.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.27% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -20.30% return.
MLPI
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 17.27%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- -20.30%
- 6M
- -36.82%
- 1Y
- -13.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
MLPI
BTCI
MLPI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.48 | 0.02 | +7.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPI and BTCI is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MLPI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than BTCI's 43.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 43.61% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
Drawdowns
MLPI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and BTCI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -44.98% | +42.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -41.07% | +39.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -12.77% | +12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.34% | — |
Volatility
MLPI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.12% | 40.07% | -28.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 41.41% | -30.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 41.41% | -30.29% |