PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD vs. MLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.59% return.


MLPD

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
5.20%
6M
6.70%
1Y
15.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
23.59%
6M
23.51%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
20.92%
10Y*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MLPD and MLPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2024

0.79

The correlation between MLPD and MLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

MLPD vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPD
MLPX

Energy

100.0%
99.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.3%

Energy

MLPD
100.0%
MLPX
99.5%

Basic Materials

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Communication Services

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Financial Services

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Healthcare

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Industrials

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Real Estate

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Technology

MLPD

-

MLPX

-

Utilities

MLPD

-

MLPX
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD
MLPD Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MLPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPDMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.82

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

7.27

+3.15

MLPD vs. MLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the MLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD and MLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPDMLPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.50

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.35

+0.79

Drawdowns

MLPD vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD drawdown since its inception was -12.90%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD and MLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPDMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-70.67%

+57.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.80%

-8.18%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-5.68%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-16.63%

+15.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

3.17%

-1.70%

Volatility

MLPD vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is 2.91%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that MLPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPDMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

6.41%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.32%

11.84%

-6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

15.38%

-7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

20.08%

-8.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

26.50%

-15.10%

MLPD vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPD vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

MLPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.44%, more than MLPX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
13.44%13.45%6.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.15%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPD and MLPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to MLPD (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPD dropped -12.90% vs MLPX's -70.67%.

On 1-year performance, MLPX leads with 22.94% vs 15.24% for MLPD. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 22.94% return vs 15.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for MLPD.

MLPD has the higher dividend yield at 13.44%, compared with 4.15% for MLPX.

MLPD is categorized as Derivative Income, while MLPX is MLPs. MLPD tracks Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MLPD and 0.45% for MLPX.

MLPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD and MLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer