MLPD vs. MLPX
MLPD (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index, while MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MLPD returned 15.24% vs 22.94% for MLPX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MLPX.
Performance
MLPD vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPD achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.59% return.
MLPD
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 5.20%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 23.51%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 20.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
MLPD vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF | 5.20% | 11.77% | 9.42% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.59% | 4.96% | 26.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPD and MLPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MLPD and MLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
MLPD vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPD
MLPX
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
MLPD
MLPX
Basic Materials
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Communication Services
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Financial Services
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Healthcare
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Industrials
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Real Estate
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Technology
MLPD
-
MLPX
-
Utilities
MLPD
-
MLPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPD vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPD
MLPX
MLPD vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPD | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 2.82 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 7.27 | +3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPD | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.50 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.35 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
MLPD vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPD drawdown since its inception was -12.90%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPD | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.90% | -70.67% | +57.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.80% | -8.18% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -5.68% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -16.63% | +15.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 3.17% | -1.70% |
Volatility
MLPD vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is 2.91%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that MLPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPD | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 6.41% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 11.84% | -6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.40% | 15.38% | -7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 20.08% | -8.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 26.50% | -15.10% |
MLPD vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPD vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
MLPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.44%, more than MLPX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF | 13.44% | 13.45% | 6.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.15% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPD and MLPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to MLPD (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPD dropped -12.90% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
On 1-year performance, MLPX leads with 22.94% vs 15.24% for MLPD. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 22.94% return vs 15.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for MLPD.
MLPD has the higher dividend yield at 13.44%, compared with 4.15% for MLPX.
MLPD is categorized as Derivative Income, while MLPX is MLPs. MLPD tracks Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MLPD and 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPD and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer