MLPD.L vs. QYLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).

MLPD.L and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on May 15, 2013. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both MLPD.L and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	18.10%	2.33%	22.53%	19.70%	31.84%	36.86%	-31.37%	7.22%	-14.92%	-8.67%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	0.02%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 18.10% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 9.87%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.89% annualized return.

MLPD.L

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.53%
• YTD: 18.10%
• 6M: 18.70%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: 19.63%
• 5Y*: 21.27%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

QYLD

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: -1.52%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 16.31%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 6.88%
• 10Y*: 8.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

MLPD.L

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)

Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L

MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 72
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPD.L	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	1.00	-0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	1.61	-0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.31	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	1.51	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.33	9.98	-8.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPD.L	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	1.00	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.47	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.58	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.55	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and QYLD is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, less than QYLD's 11.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	7.61%	8.21%	8.18%	8.60%	7.98%	8.57%	11.03%	10.06%	9.87%	8.15%	8.14%	9.96%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.92%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPD.L	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.22%	-24.75%	-57.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.03%	-10.84%	-6.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.78%	-24.61%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.74%	-24.75%	-50.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-2.41%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.57%	-3.89%	-24.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.81%	1.64%	+5.17%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) is 4.12%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that MLPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPD.L	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	4.90%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	7.48%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.93%	16.42%	+2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	14.84%	+5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.48%	15.51%	+12.97%