MLPD.L vs. EIPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX).
MLPD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on May 15, 2013. EIPIX is managed by EIP Funds. It was launched on Aug 21, 2006.
Performance
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 18.10% | 2.33% | 22.53% | 19.70% | 31.84% | 36.86% | -31.37% | 7.22% | -14.92% | -8.67% |
EIPIX EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) | 18.96% | 11.31% | 26.74% | 6.25% | 16.19% | 21.80% | -9.85% | 23.09% | -11.68% | -0.68% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPD.L having a 18.10% return and EIPIX slightly higher at 18.96%.
MLPD.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 18.10%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 21.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
EIPIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 18.96%
- 6M
- 19.69%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 18.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPIX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPD.L
EIPIX
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPD.L | EIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 1.71 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 2.18 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 1.95 | -1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 9.16 | -7.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPD.L | EIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.71 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.54 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPD.L and EIPIX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Dividend Comparison
MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, less than EIPIX's 13.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.61% | 8.21% | 8.18% | 8.60% | 7.98% | 8.57% | 11.03% | 10.06% | 9.87% | 8.15% | 8.14% | 9.96% |
EIPIX EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) | 13.21% | 15.71% | 7.60% | 4.09% | 25.10% | 3.44% | 4.02% | 3.44% | 3.45% | 1.77% | 0.78% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than EIPIX's maximum drawdown of -43.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and EIPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPD.L | EIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.22% | -43.98% | -38.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.03% | -12.61% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.78% | -16.71% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.15% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -5.09% | -23.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 2.69% | +4.12% |
Volatility
MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) at 2.88%. This indicates that MLPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPD.L | EIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 2.88% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 7.30% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 14.40% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 15.63% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 18.84% | +9.64% |