MLPD.L vs. EIPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) and EIPIX (EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MLPD.L returned 17.42%/yr vs 15.92%/yr for EIPIX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for EIPIX.

Performance

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly higher than EIPIX's 17.00% return.

MLPD.L

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 19.38%
• 6M: 16.54%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 17.42%
• 10Y*: 7.30%

EIPIX

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 17.00%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 22.98%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 15.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	19.38%	2.33%	22.53%	19.70%	31.84%	36.86%	-31.37%	7.22%	-14.92%	-8.67%
EIPIX EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)	17.00%	11.31%	26.74%	6.25%	16.19%	21.80%	-9.85%	23.09%	-11.68%	-0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and EIPIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016	0.54

The correlation between MLPD.L and EIPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L

MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

EIPIX

EIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
EIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
EIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPD.L	EIPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.42	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	3.52	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.41	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	5.37	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	17.92	-12.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the EIPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and EIPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPD.L	EIPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	2.42	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.02	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.52	-0.37

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than EIPIX's maximum drawdown of -43.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and EIPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPD.L	EIPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.22%	-43.98%	-38.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.49%	-4.51%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.23%	-13.00%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.78%	-16.71%	-5.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	-3.19%	+0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-5.02%	-23.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	1.35%	+1.96%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) at 3.67%. This indicates that MLPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPD.L	EIPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	3.67%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.96%	7.86%	+3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	10.05%	+4.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.38%	15.65%	+4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.35%	18.73%	+9.62%

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPIX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPD.L vs. EIPIX - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, less than EIPIX's 13.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIPIX EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)	13.43%	15.71%	7.60%	4.09%	25.10%	3.44%	4.02%	3.44%	3.45%	1.77%	0.78%	0.00%
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	7.53%	8.21%	8.18%	8.60%	7.98%	8.57%	11.03%	10.06%	9.87%	8.15%	8.14%	9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPD.L and EIPIX in my portfolio?

MLPD.L and EIPIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.