PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD.L vs. MLPZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPD.L having a 19.38% return and MLPZX slightly higher at 19.85%. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has underperformed MLPZX with an annualized return of 7.30%, while MLPZX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.79% annualized return.


MLPD.L

1D
1.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
19.38%
6M
16.54%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
7.30%

MLPZX

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
19.85%
6M
18.57%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
19.25%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.38%2.33%22.53%19.70%31.84%36.86%-31.37%7.22%-14.92%-8.67%
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
19.85%7.88%24.54%20.71%25.10%44.98%-25.49%14.50%-12.92%-8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and MLPZX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.62

The correlation between MLPD.L and MLPZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPZX
MLPZX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MLPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPD.LMLPZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.10

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

13.06

-8.11

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the MLPZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and MLPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPD.LMLPZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.14

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

1.12

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.38

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.33

-0.18

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than MLPZX's maximum drawdown of -77.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and MLPZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPD.LMLPZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-77.56%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-6.07%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-14.46%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-17.90%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

-73.62%

-2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-4.42%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-13.53%

-14.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

1.90%

+1.41%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) at 4.97%. This indicates that MLPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPD.LMLPZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

4.97%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

8.81%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

11.66%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

17.35%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

25.85%

+2.50%

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPZX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPD.L vs. MLPZX - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than MLPZX's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.53%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
5.54%6.87%5.92%7.19%7.98%9.19%16.57%13.12%13.27%10.70%9.79%10.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPD.L and MLPZX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and MLPZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer