PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPB vs. BSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPB vs. BSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 23.17% return, which is significantly higher than BSMY's 1.30% return.


MLPB

1D
1.47%
1M
6.90%
6M
16.96%
YTD
23.17%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
8.59%

BSMY

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.25%
6M
0.44%
YTD
1.30%
1Y
7.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPB vs. BSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MLPB and BSMY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MLPB and BSMY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPB vs. BSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPB
MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMY
BSMY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPB vs. BSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPBBSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.30

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

7.98

-1.33

MLPB vs. BSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the BSMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPB and BSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPB vs. BSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, which is greater than BSMY's maximum drawdown of -6.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and BSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPBBSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.93%

-6.81%

-65.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-3.31%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.95%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-1.88%

-12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

0.95%

+2.77%

Volatility

MLPB vs. BSMY - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) at 0.93%. This indicates that MLPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPBBSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

0.93%

+4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

2.72%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.27%

3.48%

+10.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

5.12%

+14.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

5.12%

+22.07%

MLPB vs. BSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMY's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPB vs. BSMY - Dividend Comparison

MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than BSMY's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BSMY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF
3.50%3.31%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
5.86%6.51%5.95%6.37%6.00%6.98%11.93%7.98%8.11%7.23%6.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPB and BSMY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPB has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to BSMY (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPB dropped -71.93% vs BSMY's -6.81%.

On 1-year performance, MLPB leads with 24.66% vs 7.58% for BSMY. On fees, BSMY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 24.66% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.

MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 3.50% for BSMY.

MLPB is categorized as MLPs, while BSMY is Municipal Bonds. MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while BSMY tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.18% for BSMY.

BSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPB and BSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer