PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPAX vs. VADDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund (VADDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPAX achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than VADDX's 9.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPAX has underperformed VADDX with an annualized return of 8.64%, while VADDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.


MLPAX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
17.63%
6M
16.11%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
21.02%
10Y*
8.64%

VADDX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.87%
YTD
9.59%
6M
10.02%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
17.63%4.31%40.77%20.43%29.07%39.45%-30.58%5.60%-15.05%-7.22%
VADDX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund
9.59%11.16%12.68%13.58%-11.86%29.27%12.56%28.92%-7.96%18.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPAX and VADDX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPAX and VADDX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPAX vs. VADDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPAX
MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VADDX
VADDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VADDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VADDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VADDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VADDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VADDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund (VADDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPAXVADDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

2.47

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

9.36

-0.74

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the VADDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPAX and VADDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPAXVADDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.68

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.51

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.63

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.47

-0.17

Drawdowns

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPAX drawdown since its inception was -77.51%, which is greater than VADDX's maximum drawdown of -60.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPAX and VADDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPAXVADDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.51%

-60.12%

-17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-7.88%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-17.86%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-21.58%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.85%

-39.39%

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-0.42%

-3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-7.00%

-10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.07%

+0.15%

Volatility

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund (VADDX) at 2.60%. This indicates that MLPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VADDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPAXVADDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

2.60%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

8.39%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

11.65%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.46%

16.27%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

18.54%

+7.43%

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPAX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VADDX's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPAX vs. VADDX - Dividend Comparison

MLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than VADDX's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
5.25%5.72%5.00%5.91%6.56%7.91%14.02%9.91%10.40%8.21%7.34%7.99%
VADDX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund
9.20%10.09%8.88%4.86%8.45%9.92%6.38%4.68%7.13%2.97%0.30%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPAX and VADDX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPAX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to VADDX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPAX dropped -77.51% vs VADDX's -60.12%.

MLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPAX and VADDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer