PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLCO vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLCO vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLCO achieves a -23.65% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MLCO has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of -7.04%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.53% annualized return.


MLCO

1D
0.52%
1M
5.86%
YTD
-23.65%
6M
-35.56%
1Y
-7.52%
3Y*
-20.83%
5Y*
-19.47%
10Y*
-7.04%

NEM

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
8.10%
6M
20.40%
1Y
96.26%
3Y*
39.72%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
14.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLCO vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
-23.65%30.74%-34.72%-22.87%12.97%-45.12%-22.55%41.19%-37.90%100.80%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
8.10%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MLCO and NEM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2006

0.12

Fundamentals

EPS

MLCO:

$0.57

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

MLCO:

10.08

NEM:

16.96

PEG Ratio

MLCO:

0.15

NEM:

0.44

PS Ratio

MLCO:

0.44

NEM:

5.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLCO:

$5.30B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLCO:

$1.81B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

MLCO:

$1.19B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLCO vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLCO
MLCO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLCO vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLCONEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.33

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

3.55

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

9.72

-9.98

MLCO vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLCO and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLCONEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

2.09

-2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.31

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.41

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.13

-0.22

Drawdowns

MLCO vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLCO drawdown since its inception was -89.50%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLCO and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLCONEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.50%

-81.30%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.58%

-27.25%

-20.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.52%

-36.57%

-29.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.37%

-62.40%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.55%

-62.40%

-23.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.97%

-18.20%

-65.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-41.39%

-13.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.79%

9.94%

+18.85%

Volatility

MLCO vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is 9.41%, while Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that MLCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLCONEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

13.05%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.88%

36.01%

-6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.84%

46.26%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.59%

37.67%

+20.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.95%

35.50%

+16.45%

Dividends

MLCO vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

MLCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.88%2.62%3.14%5.76%4.52%0.68%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
0.95%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

MLCO vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
1.37B
0
(MLCO) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MLCO and NEM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to MLCO (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLCO dropped -89.50% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLCO and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer