MKAM vs. EAOK
MKAM (MKAM ETF) and EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MKAM is actively managed, while EAOK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MKAM returned 9.64%/yr vs 8.55%/yr for EAOK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MKAM charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOK.
Performance
MKAM vs. EAOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKAM achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than EAOK's 3.44% return.
MKAM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOK
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- —
MKAM vs. EAOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MKAM MKAM ETF | 3.90% | 8.07% | 12.15% | 7.69% |
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.44% | 11.47% | 5.81% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MKAM and EAOK is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MKAM and EAOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKAM vs. EAOK — Risk / Return Rank
MKAM
EAOK
MKAM vs. EAOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MKAM ETF (MKAM) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MKAM | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 2.46 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.19 | 10.57 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MKAM vs. EAOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKAM drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum EAOK drawdown of -19.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKAM and EAOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKAM | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -19.91% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.72% | -4.43% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.01% | -7.08% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -0.79% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -4.98% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.03% | -0.01% |
Volatility
MKAM vs. EAOK - Volatility Comparison
MKAM ETF (MKAM) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) have volatilities of 2.40% and 2.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MKAM | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 2.31% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.94% | 4.86% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.41% | 5.80% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 7.10% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 6.85% | -0.54% |
MKAM vs. EAOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MKAM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOK's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
MKAM vs. EAOK - Dividend Comparison
MKAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than EAOK's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
MKAM MKAM ETF | 2.94% | 2.56% | 1.88% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MKAM and EAOK have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKAM has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to EAOK (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKAM dropped -5.01% vs EAOK's -19.91%.
On 3-year performance, MKAM leads with 9.64% vs 8.55% for EAOK. On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MKAM has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for MKAM.
EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.94% for MKAM.
They also come from different issuers: MKAM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for MKAM and 0.18% for EAOK.
MKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MKAM and EAOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer