MKAM vs. BAMA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MKAM (MKAM ETF) and BAMA (Brookstone Active ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MKAM returned 12.35% vs 17.23% for BAMA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MKAM charges 0.96%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BAMA.

Performance

MKAM vs. BAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MKAM ETF (MKAM) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKAM achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than BAMA's 6.64% return.

MKAM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.58%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 6M: 3.53%
• 1Y: 12.35%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMA

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 6M: 6.22%
• 1Y: 17.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKAM vs. BAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MKAM MKAM ETF	3.90%	8.07%	12.15%	4.83%
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	6.64%	12.61%	14.99%	8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MKAM and BAMA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.91

The correlation between MKAM and BAMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MKAM vs. BAMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKAM

MKAM Risk / Return Rank: 67
MKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
MKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

BAMA

BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 57
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKAM vs. BAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MKAM ETF (MKAM) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MKAM	BAMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.73	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.47	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.35	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.19	10.31	+1.87

MKAM vs. BAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the BAMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKAM and BAMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MKAM vs. BAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKAM drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum BAMA drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKAM and BAMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MKAM	BAMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.01%	-12.27%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.72%	-7.35%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-2.56%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-1.27%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.67%	-0.65%

Volatility

MKAM vs. BAMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MKAM ETF (MKAM) is 2.40%, while Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that MKAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MKAM	BAMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	4.56%	-2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.94%	8.68%	-3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.41%	10.00%	-3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.31%	10.44%	-4.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.31%	10.44%	-4.13%

MKAM vs. BAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKAM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMA's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MKAM vs. BAMA - Dividend Comparison

MKAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than BAMA's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	1.33%	1.54%	1.49%	0.45%
MKAM MKAM ETF	2.94%	2.56%	1.88%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MKAM and BAMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, MKAM and BAMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MKAM or BAMA?

BAMA has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to MKAM (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKAM dropped -5.01% vs BAMA's -12.27%.

Which ETF is better, MKAM or BAMA?

On 1-year performance, BAMA leads with 17.23% vs 12.35% for MKAM. On fees, MKAM is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, MKAM has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MKAM or BAMA?

Over the 1-year period, BAMA has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MKAM or BAMA?

MKAM is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MKAM or BAMA?

MKAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.33% for BAMA.

What is the main difference between MKAM and BAMA?

They also come from different issuers: MKAM and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for MKAM and 1.15% for BAMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.