PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MJUS vs. WEED
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MJUS vs. WEED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MJUS vs. WEED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
0.00%0.00%27.88%-17.41%-53.39%
WEED
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
-23.72%19.40%-44.93%0.87%-60.22%

Returns By Period


MJUS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WEED

1D
12.68%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
-23.72%
6M
-26.88%
1Y
37.27%
3Y*
-13.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MJUS vs. WEED - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJUS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WEED's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MJUS vs. WEED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJUS

WEED
WEED Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEED Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEED Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJUS vs. WEED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MJUS vs. WEED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MJUSWEEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and WEED is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MJUS vs. WEED - Dividend Comparison

Neither MJUS nor WEED has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. WEED - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MJUSWEEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.38%

Volatility

MJUS vs. WEED - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MJUSWEEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.88%