PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MJUS vs. AIEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MJUS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIEQ

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.24%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.05%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
10.58%13.96%14.21%

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MJUS
AIEQ

Healthcare

14.1%
7.1%

Financial Services

4.7%
13.1%

Technology

3.6%
35.7%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
10.5%

Basic Materials

-

2.4%

Communication Services

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.7%

Energy

-

2.7%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Utilities

-

0.6%

Healthcare

MJUS
14.1%
AIEQ
7.1%

Financial Services

MJUS
4.7%
AIEQ
13.1%

Technology

MJUS
3.6%
AIEQ
35.7%

Real Estate

MJUS
1.6%
AIEQ
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MJUS
0.8%
AIEQ
10.5%

Basic Materials

MJUS

-

AIEQ
2.4%

Communication Services

MJUS

-

AIEQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

MJUS

-

AIEQ
5.7%

Energy

MJUS

-

AIEQ
2.7%

Industrials

MJUS

-

AIEQ
8.3%

Utilities

MJUS

-

AIEQ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MJUS vs. AIEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJUS

AIEQ
AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MJUSAIEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MJUSAIEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

Volatility

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MJUSAIEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJUS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AIEQ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MJUS vs. AIEQ - Dividend Comparison

MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024
AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
0.39%0.43%0.65%
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MJUS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MJUS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AIEQ.

AIEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for MJUS.

MJUS is categorized as Cannabis, while AIEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJUS and 0.80% for AIEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MJUS and AIEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer