MJSC vs. JPAN

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MJSC (MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF) and JPAN (Matthews Japan Active ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MJSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JPAN.

Performance

MJSC vs. JPAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF (MJSC) and Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJSC achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly higher than JPAN's 17.81% return.

MJSC

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 22.41%
• 6M: 20.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPAN

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 17.81%
• 6M: 16.05%
• 1Y: 31.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJSC vs. JPAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF	22.41%	-0.05%
JPAN Matthews Japan Active ETF	17.81%	2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MJSC and JPAN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

MJSC vs. JPAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJSC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JPAN

JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 48
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJSC vs. JPAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF (MJSC) and Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MJSC	JPAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.27	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.16	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.66	—

Drawdowns

MJSC vs. JPAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJSC drawdown since its inception was -12.63%, smaller than the maximum JPAN drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJSC and JPAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MJSC	JPAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.63%	-15.24%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-0.48%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-3.11%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MJSC	JPAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.63%	20.27%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.63%	19.41%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.63%	19.41%	+1.22%

MJSC vs. JPAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JPAN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MJSC vs. JPAN - Dividend Comparison

MJSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than JPAN's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JPAN Matthews Japan Active ETF	4.33%	5.10%	1.53%	0.51%
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF	0.54%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MJSC and JPAN in my portfolio?

MJSC and JPAN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MJSC or JPAN?

On fees, JPAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MJSC or JPAN?

JPAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MJSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MJSC or JPAN?

JPAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.54% for MJSC.

What is the main difference between MJSC and JPAN?

They also come from different issuers: MUFG and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MJSC and 0.79% for JPAN.