PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPAN vs. FNDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPAN vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JPAN having a 15.79% return and FNDE slightly lower at 15.01%.


JPAN

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.46%
6M
10.42%
YTD
15.79%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.12%

FNDE

1D
0.66%
1M
4.72%
6M
6.81%
YTD
15.01%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.51M$30.86M$33.63M
$44.47K$43.11K$61.89K

JPAN vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
15.79%22.96%18.16%5.17%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
15.01%29.46%12.10%7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between JPAN and FNDE is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.53

The correlation between JPAN and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPAN vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPAN
FNDE

Technology

27.7%
22.3%

Industrials

21.3%
4.6%

Financial Services

18.2%
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%
8.9%

Communication Services

6.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.4%

Healthcare

1.9%
0.4%

Energy

0.6%
13.2%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

JPAN
27.7%
FNDE
22.3%

Industrials

JPAN
21.3%
FNDE
4.6%

Financial Services

JPAN
18.2%
FNDE
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JPAN
13.8%
FNDE
8.9%

Communication Services

JPAN
6.0%
FNDE
6.6%

Basic Materials

JPAN
4.8%
FNDE
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

JPAN
3.3%
FNDE
3.3%

Real Estate

JPAN
2.3%
FNDE
1.4%

Healthcare

JPAN
1.9%
FNDE
0.4%

Energy

JPAN
0.6%
FNDE
13.2%

Utilities

JPAN

-

FNDE
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPAN vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPAN
JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPAN vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPANFNDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.82

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

8.93

-1.93

JPAN vs. FNDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FNDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPAN and FNDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPAN vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPAN drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum FNDE drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPAN and FNDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPANFNDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-43.55%

+28.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-10.23%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.14%

-2.07%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-11.62%

+8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

3.22%

+1.06%

Volatility

JPAN vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) at 4.42%. This indicates that JPAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPANFNDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

4.42%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

13.64%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.09%

16.16%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

17.08%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

19.13%

+0.56%

JPAN vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPAN vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison

JPAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than FNDE's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.60%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
4.41%5.10%1.53%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPAN and FNDE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPAN has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to FNDE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPAN dropped -15.24% vs FNDE's -43.55%.

On 1-year performance, JPAN leads with 29.48% vs 29.41% for FNDE. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPAN has performed better with a 29.48% return vs 29.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JPAN.

JPAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 3.60% for FNDE.

JPAN is categorized as Japan Equities, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JPAN and 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPAN and FNDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer