MJSC vs. RAYJ
MJSC (MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF) and RAYJ (Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. Both are actively managed. MJSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for RAYJ.
Performance
MJSC vs. RAYJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MJSC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- 6M
- 13.07%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RAYJ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $114.98K | $115.12K | $170.00K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MJSC vs. RAYJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF | 0.16% |
RAYJ Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MJSC vs. RAYJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF (MJSC) and Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF (RAYJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MJSC vs. RAYJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MJSC drawdown since its inception was -12.63%, which is greater than RAYJ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJSC and RAYJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MJSC | RAYJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.63% | 0.00% | -12.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | 0.00% | -5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.02% | 0.00% | -3.02% |
Volatility
MJSC vs. RAYJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MJSC | RAYJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.18% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.18% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | — | — |
MJSC vs. RAYJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MJSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RAYJ's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
MJSC vs. RAYJ - Dividend Comparison
MJSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while RAYJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF | 0.55% | 0.66% |
RAYJ Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, RAYJ is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAYJ is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MJSC.
MJSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for RAYJ.
They also come from different issuers: MUFG and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MJSC and 0.72% for RAYJ.
Find the right allocation for MJSC and RAYJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer