PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPAN vs. ADVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPAN vs. ADVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPAN achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly lower than ADVE's 22.27% return.


JPAN

1D
0.60%
1M
6.19%
YTD
17.03%
6M
18.72%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ADVE

1D
1.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
22.27%
6M
24.39%
1Y
42.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPAN vs. ADVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
17.03%22.96%18.16%5.77%
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
22.27%26.12%7.02%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JPAN and ADVE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023

0.73

The correlation between JPAN and ADVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPAN vs. ADVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPAN
ADVE

Industrials

25.5%
13.6%

Technology

21.7%
29.0%

Financial Services

19.2%
27.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
6.9%

Communication Services

6.8%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.4%

Healthcare

2.6%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
4.0%

Energy

0.7%
1.2%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Industrials

JPAN
25.5%
ADVE
13.6%

Technology

JPAN
21.7%
ADVE
29.0%

Financial Services

JPAN
19.2%
ADVE
27.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JPAN
12.4%
ADVE
6.9%

Communication Services

JPAN
6.8%
ADVE
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

JPAN
3.3%
ADVE
2.9%

Basic Materials

JPAN
3.2%
ADVE
3.4%

Healthcare

JPAN
2.6%
ADVE
1.1%

Real Estate

JPAN
2.2%
ADVE
4.0%

Energy

JPAN
0.7%
ADVE
1.2%

Utilities

JPAN

-

ADVE
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPAN vs. ADVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPAN
JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPAN vs. ADVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPANADVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

2.52

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

3.50

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.71

-1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.32

14.74

-7.42

JPAN vs. ADVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the ADVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPAN and ADVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPANADVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.52

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Drawdowns

JPAN vs. ADVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPAN drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum ADVE drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPAN and ADVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPANADVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-18.41%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-11.73%

-2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-3.15%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

2.95%

+1.16%

Volatility

JPAN vs. ADVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) is 4.63%, while Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that JPAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPANADVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

5.98%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

14.40%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

16.88%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

15.69%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

15.69%

+3.58%

JPAN vs. ADVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JPAN and ADVE have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

JPAN vs. ADVE - Dividend Comparison

JPAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than ADVE's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.44%2.97%6.00%0.37%
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
4.36%5.10%1.53%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPAN and ADVE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADVE has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to JPAN (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPAN dropped -15.24% vs ADVE's -18.41%.

On 1-year performance, ADVE leads with 42.25% vs 27.88% for JPAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JPAN has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ADVE has performed better with a 42.25% return vs 27.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPAN and ADVE have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JPAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 2.44% for ADVE.

JPAN is categorized as Japan Equities, while ADVE is Asia Pacific Equities.

ADVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPAN and ADVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer